We Won’t Let Them Get Away With It.
The Executive Branch is corrupt and overpowered. Foreign nations are pulling our strings, and crimes against children go unpunished. AI may make it better or worse, so we need a plan.
Because everything we care about, like affordable housing, a sustainable environment, clean food, fair taxes, and ending genocide/war is downstream of the will of the criminal Epstein class who are selling our democracy for parts - and are getting away with it. Now is no time for politics as usual. It’s time to fight back. Together, we can win a better future for all.
Jamie Joyce is running for Congress (D12, CA) and has a plan to stop the Epstein class
Will never accept AIPAC money. #EndTheGenocide
Meet Jamie Joyce
Jamie is a multidisciplinary expert, executive, researcher, and activist living in Berkeley, CA who is respected by global leaders and has the right expertise for government in this moment of technological change.
Learn more about Jamie’s background and policies here.
Jamie is here to defend democracy in the age of AI and executive overreach.
-
Jamie has a passion and expertise in governance systems. Over the past decade, Jamie has worked in "civic/democracy tech," which is the global movement of technologists working to modernize government and make it more transparent, accessible, and effective. Here are some highlights:
Jamie’s Background in Building Tech for Democracy: Jamie has led technical teams through a nonprofit she founded which focuses on making sure democratic systems survive the 21st century. Her teams have been contracted or tasked to build intelligence products for PhD researchers, non-profit organizations, think tanks (one working with a U.S. senator), a U.S. city, AI companies, and members of the general public. Her work has included drafting legislation, building decision-making models for local governments, modeling civilization-scale policy debate, authoring intelligence briefs, designing AI research tools, and pioneering an entirely new method called "Scaled Democratic Reasoning” - a new form of logical reasoning at scale.
She co-launched Democracy's Library at the Internet Archive: The Internet Archive (best known for the Wayback Machine) sought Jamie out to launch a massive effort to digitize and open up U.S. local, state, and federal government documents. Jamie got to work diagnosing challenges with records management at every level of government and wrote a lengthy landscape analysis. The Superintendent of Documents of the United States flew from D.C. to California to join her and the Archive when she presented this work. This expertise is what, in part, informs her perspective on how we can get more Epstein files.
With her team, she helped map the entire U.S. government including documenting hundreds of executive branch agencies in order to understand available levers of change, government mandates, and the records they hold.
She's read hundreds of bills, written her own, and taught students from 32 Universities and colleges how to logically deconstruct legislative text through educational internships.
At USC Dornsife's Center for the Political Future, the director personally asked her to build an internship program teaching students the political decision-making models that she invented.
She's given dozens of talks, including in multiple countries on modernizing democracy for the 21st century, has written several articles, and is contributor to two books (one on the future of democracy).
Last year she moved to D.C. for 3 months to negotiate with DOGE to protect agencies. One agency she wanted to protect was NARA, and it seems that NARA was never cut by DOGE. She was then asked to deliver an internal government briefing about the importance of digitizing declassified records. A government official at NARA wanted to thank Jamie for this advocacy with a private tour of the U.S. Treaties Vault, where she got to view, in person, the Treaty of Paris (which is the document that Benjamin Franklin signed to end the Revolutionary War). This is not the only internal government briefing Jamie has been asked to make.
The Foresight Institute (which has backed multiple future Nobel laureates) named her a Collective Intelligence fellow.
See sources at: https://www.jamiejoyce.com/jamies-background
-
Recognition of her work in AI: Jamie has spent years in the AI field, leading projects in autonomous research, fact-checking agents, and AI-powered formal reasoning for evidence-based policy. The Future of Life Foundation named her an "AI For Human Reasoning" fellow. She was interviewed for "The AI Doc" alongside some of the biggest names in the AI field, and is endorsed by one of the producers. OpenAI and xAI have both invited her in to present her work internally. Her work has been mentioned in a published scholarly work by Anthropic AI researchers - specifically writing on the topic of democracy. World-renowned AI ethicists, activists, movement builders, and even some top CEOs count her as a trusted confidante. She is endorsed by one of the most world-famous AI ethicists.
Understanding the debate about AI: Jamie has been mapping the debates about AI for years (building databases of papers, public commentary, and government policy), but she doesn't just study AI issues - she works with it every day, and she knows we both need to take action now and need to make a plan for the longterm.
What she is bringing to the table: The part of the MAD Act (which Jamie authored) that is dedicated to AI is 240+ pages of serious policy, including: immediate red-line regulations, interim safeguards, hammer provisions, and a mandate forcing the government to build a real plan for AI's impact across 19 domains (from jobs to the environment) with the process to draft evidence-based policy. AI/LLMs/ML are great tools, but we need to be sure it works for people - not against them. Jamie wants people to keep building, but do it with guardrails to prevent harms.
Why this matters: Most politicians get briefed on AI, but Jamie has worked in and around the field. She's been building with it, documenting its harms, and tracking the debate for years. If elected, she'll bring that hard-won expertise to Congress because America doesn't need another campaign promise. It needs a plan for AI that actually works.
See sources at: https://www.jamiejoyce.com/jamies-background -
International Environmental and Humanitarian Work: Before working in the “democracy field,” Jamie was COO of an international environmental and humanitarian organization, overseeing projects in over 20 countries. She also served on the board of Wikitongues, the nonprofit fighting to preserve all 7,000+ of the world's languages. Projects she oversaw included:
providing job training to women in Kirkuk, Iraq to enable women to find independence
enabling pre-teen girls to attend school in Malawi
providing technical education to 5 schools in Kenya
funding solar panels distribution programs in subsaharan Africa to curb health impacts of kerosene lamps
and many more
By “overseeing projects,” this means that Jamie vet project applications with a team, allocated funding to local project leaders, developed impact measurement studies to execute, implemented a schedule for data collection, and reviewed results to evaluate if such project were successful and could scale.
Community Work: Today, she sits on the board of the Sand Mandala Foundation, which funds artists. From her home in Berkeley, she manages a historic building as a part-time job which she opens up as cost-free venue space for the community: silent meditation retreats, choir practice, birthday parties, community theatre, weddings, art shows, and memorials. Jamie is also a community archivist. When she lived in Orlando during the Pulse Shooting at a gay nightclub, Jamie launched the World Wide Web Peace Project to capture the voices of local Orlandoans’ response to the shooting and their support for the LGBTQ community. Jamie also went to local mourning sites and sealed letters, notes, and cards in plastic to protect them from the Florida rain. She also helped collect these artifacts to donate to the local historical society.
Her memberships have included: the Rotary Club, the Society of American Archivists, the American Library Association, the Office of Intellectual Freedom, Nation of Makers, the Freedom to Read Foundation, the Linux Foundation, and the C2PA. She's a Wikipedia editor. She's volunteered for the Human Library. She was an advisor to Atlas Computing. And she co-founded Canonical Debate Labs.
Jamie has always fought for a better world. She's not stopping anytime soon.
See sources at: https://www.jamiejoyce.com/jamies-background
What’s Jamie’s plan?
It starts with the MAD Act
Jamie is a Berkeley resident who has experience writing federal legislation, an expertise in government records, and has worked in the AI/tech sector. So after Jamie announced she was running for office as a democratic candidate, she spent several hundred hours writing The MAD Act (The Mass Accountability in Democracy Act). The MAD Act is a 650+ page omnibus bill that rebalances power between government and the people. It takes aim at the tools that the Epstein class has at their disposal to maintain power and ensures our democracy is prepared for AI impact.
There is a lot we need to fix:
Make a plan for AI: we can keep the benefits, and stop the harms (read more)
Delete the surveillance state (read more)
Get more Epstein files from the 70+ entities we missed the first time (read more)
Get ICE off our streets (read more)
Shine a light on dark money (read more)
Enable election reform (read more)
And more (Read MAD Act Website and Full Bill Text / Other Titles)
With this one bill, we can take our country back, though the bill can also be introduced as individual titles strategically
The MAD Act is not “anti-AI,” “anti-security,” or “anti-business,” it is simply pro-responsibility, safety, accountability, and aggressively defends our rights. The public is outmatched, and we need to rebalance power. Jamie is working to get the MAD Act introduced right away - there is no need to wait for the election to demand change.
So what happens if Jamie is elected?
The “Just 12” Strategy & Modernizing Congress
What happens if the MAD Act passes before the midterms? What comes next?
Jamie is ready to serve as a legislator, but if elected, she's just 1 of 435. She's running as a Democrat, but she refuses to let a "blue wave" become “business as usual.” She's been that disappointed voter too many times.
So she has a strategy: build a disruptive voting bloc.
Jamie is recruiting 11 other congressional candidates from across the political spectrum to run as a unified bloc. Why 12 in total? Because neither party can pass legislation in the House without a majority. Twelve members who refuse to rubber-stamp bills that don't serve the people become a critical voting unit if the house is full - which is likely with the most contentious issues.
Both republicans and democrats answer to special interests. A Democratic majority alone won't guarantee the progress we need. But 12 united members who answer only to voters can help change the game.
This voting bloc doesn’t need to outnumber anyone, they just need to ensure that every bill to earn their vote by truly representing public interest.
That's not being disruptive for the sake of disruption. This is leverage. And that's how the game changes. Are you a candidate? Please join Jamie in the “Just 12” strategy.
In addition, Jamie aims to map the workflows of Congress and bring technology into offices to ensure staff are able to be more accountable and effective in their work for the American people and this district.